Previously, the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) issued a Recommended Practice Guide (RPG) 7 which included recommended audit fee scales. This guide helped establish minimum audit fees based on a company’s revenue, total assets and total expenditures.

Recommended Practice Guide (RPG) 7: Coefficient Percentage Table

It was commonly used by auditors as a benchmark, especially for small and medium-sized companies.

Why Was the Audit Fee Guide Abolished?

The MIA withdrew RPG 7, with effect from 1 June 2015 in response to:

1. Competition Law Concerns

  • The Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) viewed recommended pricing as a potential anti-competitive practice.
  • Setting a “minimum fee” could be interpreted as price-fixing, which is prohibited under the Competition Act 2010.

2. Market-Driven Environment

  • MIA aligned with international best practices, moving toward a market-based approach.
  • The profession was encouraged to let supply and demand dictate fees based on complexity, scope, risk, and company size.

How Are Audit Fees Determined Now in Malaysia?

Though RPG 7 is abolished, some practitioners and companies still refer to it informally, especially for internal budgeting or pricing reference. Currently, there is no official fee schedule, but audit fees are typically based on a combination of factors. Key factors influencing audit fees:

  • Size of the company (Revenue, total assets)
  • Complexity of operations
  • Number of transactions/accounts
  • Industry (specialised vs regulated vs non-regulated)
  • Risk level & internal controls
  • Audit firm’s reputation & location
  • Deadline pressures
  • Special reporting needs (consolidation, group audits, MPERS/MFRS/IFRS, etc)